Insurance status, not race, is a determinant of outcomes from vehicular injury.
نویسندگان
چکیده
BACKGROUND Hypothesizing that outcomes from specific injury mechanisms should not vary by race or socioeconomic status, we analyzed the relationship of race and ethnicity to fatality in motor vehicle crash victims treated during 2008 and 2009. STUDY DESIGN Logistic regression analysis of pooled administrative data assessed the contribution of patient demographics and injury severity to outcome, defined as mortality during acute hospitalization. Demographic factors included age, sex, race, ethnicity, and insurance. Severe injury was defined using ICD-9 Injury Severity Score (survival probability) p < 0.85, presence of up to 3 comorbidities, and/or diagnosis of spinal cord injury and/or traumatic brain injury. Mortality was stratified by survival time after trauma center arrival to death within 24 hours or thereafter. Factors contributing to outcomes were tested using chi square analysis of the calculated model estimate. RESULTS For 8,758 motor vehicle crash victims treated in state-designated trauma centers, age, sex, injury severity, and 2 or more comorbidities consistently predicted survival. Neither race nor ethnicity was associated with increased mortality risk. Being uninsured was related to death within 24 hours (p < 0.001). The majority of the uninsured who died within 24 hours had an ICD-9 Injury Severity Score p ≤ 0.5. Mortality risk after 24 hours was driven by traumatic brain injury and comorbidities. CONCLUSIONS The results of this study indicated that higher immediate mortality of the uninsured is a behavioral and socioeconomic rather than physiologic marker. This higher mortality is driven by increased injury severity that increases cost of care in uninsured survivors. This disparity suggests that risk-taking behavior, especially relating to safety practices and licensing regulations, is an important etiologic factor. Improved outcomes require better public education and enforcement in conjunction with improvements in processes of care.
منابع مشابه
Tracheostomy risk factors and outcomes after severe traumatic brain injury.
OBJECTIVE To determine risk factors associated with tracheostomy placement after severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) and subsequent outcomes among those who did and did not receive a tracheostomy. METHODS This retrospective cohort study compared adult trauma patients with severe TBI (n = 583) who did and did not receive tracheostomy. A multivariable logistic regression model assessed the asso...
متن کاملAssociation of Insurance Status with Health Outcomes Following Traumatic Injury: Statewide Multicenter Analysis
INTRODUCTION Recognizing disparities in definitive care for traumatic injuries created by insurance status may help reduce the higher risk of trauma-related mortality in this population. Our objective was to understand the relationship between patients' insurance status and trauma outcomes. METHODS We collected data on all patients involved in traumatic injury from eight Level I and 15 Level ...
متن کاملShoulder Arthroplasty Utilization by Race - Are Black Patients Under-Represented?
INTRODUCTION The purpose of this study is to analyze national and institutional trends in shoulder arthroplasty utilization by race. METHODS The Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) was analyzed to determine racial trends in shoulder arthroplasty utilization nationally. An institutional database was then utilized to retrospectively identify all patients undergoing shoulder arthr...
متن کاملHomicide as a medical outcome: racial disparity in deaths from assault in US Level I and II trauma centers.
BACKGROUND Since 1900, thousands of medical journal articles have been published on the topic of racial disparities in health and medical outcomes in the United States, including overlapping disparities based on health insurance status. But research on the question of such disparities in the medical treatment of injury from assault-matters of public safety, considerable public expense, and poli...
متن کاملInsurance status is a potent predictor of outcomes in both blunt and penetrating trauma.
BACKGROUND Patients with penetrating injuries are known to have worse outcomes than those with blunt trauma. We hypothesize that within each injury mechanism there should be no outcome difference between insured and uninsured patients. METHODS The National Trauma Data Bank version 7 was analyzed. Patients aged 65 years and older and burn patients were excluded. The insurance status was catego...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Journal of the American College of Surgeons
دوره 212 4 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2011